<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Actual cost of TARP bailouts: $2.9 trillion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tindog.com/2009/03/31/actual-cost-of-tarp-bailouts-29-trillion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tindog.com/2009/03/31/actual-cost-of-tarp-bailouts-29-trillion/</link>
	<description>digressing one cup at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:35:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.tindog.com/2009/03/31/actual-cost-of-tarp-bailouts-29-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 07:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tindog.com/?p=1496#comment-30</guid>
		<description>1. In case you didn&#039;t notice, this blog post was from March 31, 2009, which is roughly a year and a half ago. If you&#039;re looking for more recent figures, I&#039;m pretty sure there are other websites on the Internet that could give you that. I&#039;m not going to go back update this post or any other old posts. 
  
 
  
2. I didn&#039;t make this number up. That number came from Neil Barofsky, the inspector general overseeing the TARP program. Further, while the quote I posted above came TheHill.com (which I kindly linked to), other news agencies reported the same information at the time, including the Wall Street Journal. If you have a problem with any of those companies&#039; reporting, go bother them. 
  
 
  
3. As for being &quot;part of the problem with the current status of the country&quot;, I think you&#039;re giving me WAY too much credit. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. In case you didn&#039;t notice, this blog post was from March 31, 2009, which is roughly a year and a half ago. If you&#039;re looking for more recent figures, I&#039;m pretty sure there are other websites on the Internet that could give you that. I&#039;m not going to go back update this post or any other old posts. </p>
<p>2. I didn&#039;t make this number up. That number came from Neil Barofsky, the inspector general overseeing the TARP program. Further, while the quote I posted above came TheHill.com (which I kindly linked to), other news agencies reported the same information at the time, including the Wall Street Journal. If you have a problem with any of those companies&#039; reporting, go bother them. </p>
<p>3. As for being &quot;part of the problem with the current status of the country&quot;, I think you&#039;re giving me WAY too much credit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann N</title>
		<link>http://www.tindog.com/2009/03/31/actual-cost-of-tarp-bailouts-29-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 05:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tindog.com/?p=1496#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I think you are being dishonest and you are part of the problem with the current status of the county.  
  
I believe the actual cost of h TARP was about 50 billion and not the insane number you have cooked up.  So  
  
 
  
Please stop polluting the minds of naive people with this garbage. 
  
 
  
On the other hand I hope that this is just outdated and you intend on updating it withe the true figures. 
  
 
  
 
  
Thanks. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are being dishonest and you are part of the problem with the current status of the county.  </p>
<p>I believe the actual cost of h TARP was about 50 billion and not the insane number you have cooked up.  So  </p>
<p>Please stop polluting the minds of naive people with this garbage. </p>
<p>On the other hand I hope that this is just outdated and you intend on updating it withe the true figures. </p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

