I didn’t want to wade into this hullabaloo over Chick-fil-A’s stance on gay marriage, I really didn’t. But I can’t help it.

To those on both sides of the issue, let me just say this:

You’re all being silly.

First, a little background. About a month ago Chick-fil-A CEO Dan Cathy was interviewed by a small North Carolina newspaper called the Biblical Recorder. In the interview, he talked extensively about his Christian faith and how Chick-fil-A has always chosen to run their business on biblical principles, including closing their restaurants on Sundays. Toward the end of the interview, the topic turned to the subject of marriage:

The company invests in Christian growth and ministry through their WinShape Foundation. The name comes from the idea of shaping people to be winners.

It began as a college scholarship and expanded to a foster care program, an international ministry, and a conference and retreat center modeled after the Billy Graham Training Center at the Cove.

“That morphed into a marriage program in conjunction with national marriage ministries,” Cathy added.

Some have opposed the company’s support of the traditional family. “Well, guilty as charged,” said Cathy when asked about this opposition.

“We are very much supportive of the family – the biblical definition of the family unit. We are a family-owned business, a family-led business, and we are married to our first wives. We give God thanks for that.

“We operate as a family business … our restaurants are typically led by families – some are single. We want to do anything we possibly can to strengthen families. We are very much committed to that,” Cathy emphasized.

The interview was picked up a couple of weeks later by the Baptist Press, and soon mainstream media outlets got wind of it, focusing only on Cathy’s supposedly “anti-gay” remarks and ignoring everything else. Before long, people began calling for a boycott of the restaurant chain. The mayors of Chicago and Boston went on record to say that Chick-fil-A wasn’t welcome in their cities. Then former Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee called on Christians to support the company by organizing a “Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day” on August 1st. All of a sudden a company that had been in business without controversy since 1967 had become a political lightning rod.

A young Baylor college student by the name of Sam Davidson wrote a lengthy blog post about the controversy and why it’s a “microcosm of everything that’s wrong with everything.” His post was way better than anything I could’ve written on the subject, so definitely go read that.

But here’s my take on the whole situation. First, it’s not like Chick-fil-A ever hid their Christian beliefs. I mean, if the whole “closed on Sundays” thing didn’t tip you off, then you obviously weren’t paying attention. Second, they’re certainly not the only Christian-based company in America. In-N-Out Burger, for example, is also a Christian-owned fast-food chain; they even print Bible verses on their cups. So why are people so outraged now and why aren’t they boycotting In-N-Out, Hobby Lobby, or any other Christian businesses? If it’s so morally wrong for non-Christians to support Christian businesses, then they should be boycotting all of them, and they should’ve been doing it all along.

But it’s not just the anti-Chick-fil-A crowd that’s acting silly. Acting as though the company is somehow the flag-bearer of Christianity in America is just as bad. Chick-fil-A is a Christian-based business, yes, but at the core, it’s still a business. If as a Christian you would prefer to give your money to them as opposed to McDonald’s or whatever, that’s fine. But don’t build them up as some kind of savior; they’re a fast-food restaurant, not Jesus himself.

Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day sends the message that we Christians should only be supporting businesses that agree with our faith (or more accurately our politics). But that’s not even realistic. Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Facebook have all been vocal proponents of gay marriage. Are we supposed to stop using all of their products as a result? It’d be tough to do much online if we did. Every company that I’ve ever worked for has provided healthcare coverage to same-sex couples. Am I supposed to only work for companies that don’t? And what if I don’t know the political position of a certain business? Should I ask for a written statement of their beliefs before I decide whether to work or do business there?

Here’s my point. Sometimes businesses will agree with what we believe in and sometimes they won’t. We certainly have the option to not give our money to such businesses if we so choose, but we shouldn’t ever expect a particular business to agree with us. It’s not like if Chick-fil-A’s profits dive 80%, Dan Cathy will suddenly start supporting gay marriage. Or if we boycott Google, they’ll suddenly decide homosexuality is morally wrong.

So go “eat mor chikin” if you want. Or don’t. Whatever. It’s not gonna change anyone’s beliefs either way.

Previously:
Which church are we?
The goal must be love
Politics, the emerging church, and Donald Miller

Comments:

  • Delan

    August 1, 2012, 6:23 pm

    Nice article – I agree about not getting all caught up in the "hullabaloo" but at points it may be necessary? Support for the restaurant is important today because of the unconstitutional aspect of the criticism – that being said, everyone should be out there, not just Christians. And if it were a (insert religion) run (insert restaurant) who came under fire – the same support would be expected because hey – who are we without free speech? AMERICA!

  • jason

    August 2, 2012, 8:57 am

    I'm not sure how this is really a free speech issue. Dan Cathy expressed his beliefs, which a bunch of people disagreed with. Fair enough. How was his First Amendment right of free speech infringed upon? Was he arrested for what he said? Fined? Sued? Nope. And how exactly is the criticism of what he said unconstitutional? People have the right to protest, even if they're acting like babies. This is just typical politics. Liberals getting "offended" by what they perceive to be homophobic remarks and Tea Party conservatives saying that you can't be a good Christian and a good American unless you eat at Chick-fil-A.

    So like you said, let's turn this around. Say a Muslim CEO of a fast food chain went on the radio and expressed his beliefs and called Christians infidels. Would the same conservative leaders who told us to support Chick-fil-A tell us to support this restaurant? No. They'd tell us to boycott it because it's anti-Christian and anti-American. And the liberals who were so outraged at Chick-fil-A would be the ones organizing an appreciation day.

    Look at what happened when some Muslims tried to build a mosque near Ground Zero. Who were the ones outraged? Christian conservatives. The same people saying we have to defend Dan Cathy's First Amendment rights were the ones trying to take those same rights away from others.

    Both sides are acting like whiny brats in this situation. It's a fast food restaurant. If you wanna eat there, fine. If you don't, no one's making you. But leave the politics out of it.

Leave a Comment:

Name:

Email:

Website:

Comment:

optional tags
blockquote
code em i
strong
q a b

Twitter

Flickr

Open, EatAmerican horseA boy and his dinosaurGood adviceThe greatest of the Harmonicats albumsExcuse me, do you have Prince Albert in a can?You could smell the cinnamon rolls from across town.Beer 5 TicketsYe Kendall InnYe Kendall Inn