the tindog coffeehouse

I’m currently blogging my way through From the Garden to the City: The Redeeming and Corrupting Power of Technology by John Dyer. A few days ago, I covered most of Chapter 7, titled “Redemption”. But there was one section I didn’t get to, which dealt with the biblical story of the Tower of Babel.

Genesis 11 says that sometime after the Great Flood, the people of the world gathered in Babylonia and built a huge tower made with fire-hardened bricks.

Then they said, “Come, let’s build a great city for ourselves with a tower that reaches into the sky. This will make us famous and keep us from being scattered all over the world.”

But the Lord came down to look at the city and the tower the people were building. “Look!” he said. “The people are united, and they all speak the same language. After this, nothing they set out to do will be impossible for them! Come, let’s go down and confuse the people with different languages. Then they won’t be able to understand each other.”

In that way, the Lord scattered them all over the world, and they stopped building the city.

Continue reading…

This is Part 7 of my chapter-by-chapter analysis of From the Garden to the City: The Redeeming and Corrupting Power of Technology by John Dyer.

Up to this point, it seems like we’ve mostly focused on the corrupting potential of technology. Technology, after all, isn’t neutral. While the raw materials may be (Kline’s “technology as hardware” and “technology as manufacturing”), how they’re used certainly isn’t (“technology as methodology” and “technology as usage”). We saw in Chapter 5 how Adam and Eve used technology in the form of fig lives after sinning and how their son Cain used technology to build the first city. In each case, the point was to separate themselves from God, moving from interdependence to a state of independence.

If the story ended there, it would be easy to conclude, then, that technology is inherently a bad thing. But thankfully it doesn’t.

Continue reading…

I’m currently blogging my way through From the Garden to the City: The Redeeming and Corrupting Power of Technology by John Dyer, and today’s chapter focuses heavily on the “corrupting” part.

In Chapter 4, Dyer established a working definition of technology as “the human activity of using tools to transform God’s creation for practical purposes.” In the Garden of Eden, those purposes were to till the garden and cultivate the land. But once sin enters the picture, everything changes.

Rebellion.

Dyer picks up where Chapter 3 left off, with Adam and Eve still in the Garden. Technology, he pointed out earlier, was introduced by God before the Fall when He instructed Adam to “tend and watch over it” (Genesis 2:15). But after the Fall, it takes on a very different role. The first thing Adam and Eve do after sinning against God is to make something: their first set of clothes, fashioned from fig leaves (Genesis 3:7). Were the clothes a tool created for a practical purpose? Of course. But was it what God originally intended? No.

Continue reading…

This is the third part of my chapter-by-chapter analysis of From the Garden to the City: The Redeeming and Corrupting Power of Technology by John Dyer, and I have to say this has been the most enlightening chapter thus far.

Reflection.

One thing I love about this book is that Dyer is just as qualified to talk about Christianity as he is about technology. He has a Masters in Theology from Dallas Theological Seminary but is also a highly regarded programmer and web developer, having done work for companies like Harley-Davidson, Apple, and Anheuser Busch. In short, he knows his stuff.

The reason why this is important is because most people who would write a book like this are either tech experts or theologians but not both. They either really know technology and only have a basic understanding of Scripture, or they really know Scripture but only have a basic understanding of technology. And in most cases that would be painfully obvious to the reader.

Continue reading…

Robert Jeffress, the pastor of the First Baptist Church in Dallas, generated quite the firestorm last week when he declared Mormonism to be a cult. Speaking at the Value Voters Summit, he said, “I think Mitt Romney’s a good, moral man, but those of us who are born again followers of Christ should prefer a competent Christian. Rick Perry’s a Christian. He’s an evangelical Christian, a follower of Jesus Christ. Mormonism is not Christianity. It has always been considered a cult by the mainstream of Christianity.”

Naturally, the media jumped on his comments, happily characterizing him as some backwoods Bible-thumper. A lot of Christian churches backpedaled, not willing to condemn the LDS Church. And Rick Perry himself, whom Jeffress had endorsed, quickly distanced himself from the pastor. When asked if Mormonism was a cult, Perry said without hesitation, “No.”

But the fact of the matter is, Dr. Jeffress is exactly right.

Continue reading…

Last September, our pastor challenged the church to read through the Bible in a year, something that for some reason I had never done. I had read much of the Bible but never the whole thing and never for a whole year straight. I decided it was time to change that, and so I took the challenge.

And three days ago, I finished it.

Continue reading…