the tindog coffeehouse

Source.

Previously:
‘Lord, Save Us From Your Followers’
The goal must be love
You obviously haven’t met my neighbors

I finally got around to watching Man on Fire. In the movie, Denzel Washington plays a bodyguard named Creasy who pursues the kidnappers of a little girl named Pita (played by Dakota Fanning). In the end, Pita is rescued unharmed and returned to her mother but only after Creasy willingly surrenders his life in exchange for hers.

Christian blogger Jon Acuff has written about how the movie is a perfect metaphor for how Jesus willingly gave His life as a ransom for us:

I missed it the first ten times I saw the movie. Missed that I’m Pita. I’ve lived most of my life under the stairs in a dark, dirty cage. But unlike Pita, this is the place I deserve. For although she did not ask to be kidnapped or receive this experience as a consequence of her actions, I did. If this were the story of my life, justice would have already been served. The prisoner’s life is the life I deserve. But God is like Creasy. In Isaiah 30:18 it says “he rises to show you compassion.” …

God’s love has no limits. If violence is what it would take to rescue me, I have little doubt that He would be violent. That He would remove an entire planet in a flood to save the righteous family of Noah. And even though He is blessed with the ability to open the core of the earth with His fury, it is love and ultimate surrender that shows us the true depth of His heart. In the movie, Creasy could have easily continued killing the kidnapper’s family. The brother could have been tortured, the pregnant wife and unborn child of the kidnapper murdered. But it wasn’t about revenge, it was about rescue. And when Pita was discovered to be alive, he stopped everything. He surrendered and walked willingly into a certain death. …

I’ve written about it before because the scene really shook me. It made me realize, this is the Christ I serve. Powerful, fearful, able to heal the sick and blind, capable of walking on water. But willing to give it all up upon realizing I am found. Willing to pay the ransom with his own life. Willing to free me from a prison of my own design. And whether he’s crucified on a cross or forced to walk across a bridge in Mexico, he’s willing to do it all over again for me. And for you.

Previously:
Rescued

As a footnote to a few of my recent blog posts, I would strongly recommend the 2008 documentary from Dan Merchant, Lord, Save Us From Your Followers. It’s a humbling reminder of the damage we Christians often do to the world around us but also a reminder of the healing power of Christ’s love and grace.

Previously:
Quitting Christianity
The goal must be love
You obviously haven’t met my neighbors

Author Anne Rice has caused quite a controversy by stating on Facebook that she has “quit being a Christian”:

For those who care, and I understand if you don’t: Today I quit being a Christian. I’m out. I remain committed to Christ as always but not to being “Christian” or to being part of Christianity. It’s simply impossible for me to “belong” to this quarrelsome, hostile, disputatious, and deservedly infamous group. For ten years, I’ve tried. I’ve failed. I’m an outsider. My conscience will allow nothing else. …

As I said below, I quit being a Christian. I’m out. In the name of Christ, I refuse to be anti-gay. I refuse to be anti-feminist. I refuse to be anti-artificial birth control. I refuse to be anti-Democrat. I refuse to be anti-secular humanism. I refuse to be anti-science. I refuse to be anti-life. In the name of Christ, I quit Christianity and being Christian. Amen.

Her statements seem to indicate that she hasn’t specifically given up on her faith but rather on other Christians. And certainly I can understand that. I can understand the frustration of other Christians who don’t share my particular views or beliefs. Christians who are either completely close-minded about everything or completely unwilling to define any absolutes. Christians that use the pulpit to advance their political agendas. Christians who equate the Bible to a self-help book or a get-rich-quick scheme. Christians that are quick to talk about fire and brimstone but never mention love and grace. Christians who only talk about love and grace but never mention the consequences of sin.

But however frustrated I am, I have to remember that we’re all still human and we’re all still defective. Even as Christians — who should know better — we’re pretty stupid sometimes. Actually, most of the time. Which is exactly why we needed a Savior in the first place. If we were able to live up to God’s perfect standard, we would’ve done it already, on our own and without Jesus. But we aren’t, which is why God gave up His Son to pay the price for our ridiculously stupid mistakes.

Further, as frustrated as I sometimes get with my fellow believers, I have to realize that we’re all still part of the body of Christ. All of us. As Paul explains in 1 Corinthians 12:

The human body has many parts, but the many parts make up one whole body. So it is with the body of Christ. Some of us are Jews, some are Gentiles, some are slaves, and some are free. But we have all been baptized into one body by one Spirit, and we all share the same Spirit.

Yes, the body has many different parts, not just one part. If the foot says, “I am not a part of the body because I am not a hand,” that does not make it any less a part of the body. And if the ear says, “I am not part of the body because I am not an eye,” would that make it any less a part of the body? If the whole body were an eye, how would you hear? Or if your whole body were an ear, how would you smell anything?

But our bodies have many parts, and God has put each part just where he wants it. How strange a body would be if it had only one part! Yes, there are many parts, but only one body. The eye can never say to the hand, “I don’t need you.” The head can’t say to the feet, “I don’t need you.”

By “quitting Christianity”, Anne is not only hurting herself but is hurting the entire body of Christ. And that’s heartbreaking to see.

Previously:
The goal must be love
Church dot com

Last week I wrote about my, um, “difficult” neighbors, the ones who hang out in their driveway at night getting drunk, spewing obscenities, and bringing down the rest of the neighborhood’s property values. And I also mentioned how poorly I had handled myself around them.

The good news — if you want to call it that — is that I’m not the first Christian to make a complete fool out of myself. And really, compared to people like Pat Robertson or Fred Phelps, my overreaction was extremely minor. Nevertheless, it wasn’t right, and as I said, I don’t want to live that way anymore.

Timothy, a young pastor in first-century Ephesus, ran into a similar situation. Even though the Christian church there had been growing, some within the church had veered away from the Gospel and had started teaching things that weren’t in line with Scripture. It would’ve been easy for Timothy to go off on them, to fight fire with fire, and in all likelihood he had every right to do so. But Paul had different ideas.

Yes, Timothy had a responsibility as the pastor to confront the false teachers, but Paul made it clear that the goal of such a confrontation must be love, “which comes from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith” (1 Timothy 1:5). It wasn’t about who was right and who was wrong. It wasn’t about winning an argument or proving that Timothy was better than them. It was about showing them love. That didn’t mean excusing their behavior, which is often the case in many politically correct churches today. But it didn’t mean shouting at them that they’re all going to hell either.

So what did that love look like?

Paul explains that even though he was a “a blasphemer and a persecutor and a violent man, I was shown mercy because I acted in ignorance and unbelief. The grace of our Lord was poured out on me abundantly, along with the faith and love that are in Christ Jesus” (vv. 13-14, emphasis mine). He goes on to say, “Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners — of whom I am the worst. But for that very reason I was shown mercy so that in me, the worst of sinners, Christ Jesus might display his unlimited patience as an example for those who would believe on him and receive eternal life” (vv. 15-16, emphasis mine).

Mercy. Abundant grace. Unlimited patience. The faith and love that comes from the Holy Spirit through Christ. That was Christ’s response to Paul, and it was to be Timothy’s response to those who had “shipwrecked their faith”.

And it should be my response as well.

Previously:
You obviously haven’t met my neighbors

Sunday morning our youth pastor preached in “big church” on the parable of the Good Samaritan, about how we as Christians should be pouring out Christ’s love to the people around us, to a world that is lost and broken and desperate. I sat and listened intently, agreeing with everything he said and telling myself I would be the kind of neighbor that Jesus described.

And then I went straight home and failed miserably.

That evening I was mowing the yard and honestly wasn’t in a very good mood. I didn’t want to be out there, and I was tired and sweaty and cranky. And above the roar of the lawnmower, I could hear my next-door neighbor’s rap music blaring from his open garage. So I walked over to him and gently asked him if he wouldn’t mind please turning it down a bit. Then I shook his hand and said thanks and prayed for his salvation.

OK, not really. In reality, I stormed over and yelled sarcastically, “Do you have to have your music so loud?”

Smooth, right?

I completely blew it, and I immediately felt like a horrible, horrible person because of it. And the thing is, it’s not like my wife and I even have a very good reputation among our neighbors to begin with. There are three families next to us whose favorite pastime is to stand around outside at all hours of the night getting drunk and cussing loud enough for the people four blocks over to hear. That and getting into fights and shooting off fireworks and doing anything else to generally disturb the peace — including playing really loud gangsta rap in their garage on a Sunday night.

And because they know we don’t like it, they don’t like us. They refer to my wife as “The Bitch”, and Lord only knows what they call me. Of course, it probably doesn’t help that we’ve confronted them about their antics before or that we’ve had to call the cops on them a couple of times when their behavior went too far.

Yeah, it’s a veritable lovefest around our neighborhood.

The truth is, though, I don’t want to live like that. I don’t want to be “that guy”, the stereotypical closed-minded, Bible-thumping Christian who shouts at people to repent and gripes at kids to get off my lawn. I don’t want to reinforce their notion of a God who cares more about what rules everybody is breaking than about whether they know how much He loves them in spite of it. I don’t want to respond to hatred and contempt with more hatred and contempt.

I want to love them.

I want to show them grace.

I want to give them another chance, just like God continues to give me chance after chance after chance, even when I’m a complete jerk to everyone around me.

Because that’s who God is. And that’s who I should aspire to be like.

But the problem is, love always costs. It requires our time, our money, our energy, our pride. It’s hard, especially when the people we’re supposed to love aren’t so lovable. Selfishness, on the other hand, is easy. Selfishness is quick and cheap and safe. It doesn’t require any effort on our part, which is why it’s so often our default choice.

About a week and a half ago, Christy and I went to a concert in the Deep Ellum neighborhood of Dallas, a part of town you generally want to avoid after dark. As we were standing in line waiting to get in, a homeless man who obviously had mental health issues walked up to us, freaking out because he was convinced there was a snake in his shirt. I had no idea what to say or do. I tried to reason with him, hoping he would calm down, but when that didn’t work, I humored him, telling him it was just a little snake and that he wasn’t in any danger. Honestly, I was just hoping he would go away. And mind you, this was at a Christian concert while we were in line with a bunch of other Christians. Did it cross my mind to help him take his shirt off (as the guy in front of me did, after which the man seemed to come to his senses)? No. Did it cross my mind to give him the 20 bucks I had in my wallet so he could at least buy a meal or two? No. Did it cross my mind to pray over him or tell him how much God loves him? No. Why? Because that would’ve cost me, and I was way more interested in what I wanted than what he needed.

I failed, and I’m not proud of it.

I want to have a heart for God and a heart for others. I want to love. Genuinely and openly and unselfishly. Even though it’s hard. Even though it costs.

I did apologize to my neighbor the next day for yelling at him. Hopefully that’s at least a start. Hopefully there’s still time to be the neighbor that God has called me to be.

Let it rise above, rise above
There is no song louder than love

– Switchfoot, “The Sound (John Perkins’ Blues)”

About civil rights activist John M. Perkins, Switchfoot lead singer Jon Foreman writes:

Over the next few decades Dr. Perkins’ outspoken nature and leadership in civil rights demonstrations resulted in repeated harassment, brutal beatings and imprisonment. Yet even in the hands of his oppressors he chose the path of love over violence, of compassion over hatred. His story is the story of the struggle for true freedom, freedom from even the knee-jerk reaction of retaliatory violence. His song is the song of the blessed community. His dream is the dream which Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King and so many others died for. His story is living proof that love is louder than violence, louder than hatred, and louder than racism.

The world is filled with enough noise. As Christians, we need to remember that Christ’s love speaks louder than all of it.

From Jenny Simmons, the lead singer of Christian band Addison Road:

Perhaps we have misunderstood sin though. The overarching theme of scripture is that sin is a condition, not necessarily an action. Jesus seems to speak directly into this concept when he addresses the faithful Jews at the beginning of Matthew, “You have heard it said do not murder… but I say do not have anger in your heart for another man.” Essentially he spends an entire afternoon telling these people, “you have heard the law and followed it, but now listen to the heart of the law, it’s a new command I give you. Love me. Love others. That is the point.”

Sin is a condition that indicates our separation from God. Jesus focuses less on the sin action and more on the person and their separation from God. Sin is simply that. Our separation from God. Our less than holy nature. Our blemished existence. An incomplete way of being. That is sin.

Read the whole thing. It’s long but worth the time.

Previously:
Casualties of the American dream

The question is, can a church exist completely online? A lot of other Christian writers and bloggers have already addressed this pretty extensively, but the question keeps coming up.

The short answer is no, and here’s why:

First, as Northland’s Joel Hunter (who looks eerily like George W. Bush) pointed out, a church is more than just a building. The church is the people, and those people can meet anywhere: a traditional church building, a house, at Starbucks, or even online. But it’s about more than just meeting at the same place to hear a sermon or sing some songs; it’s about relationships. The church, at its heart, is a community of believers who learn together, worship together, pray for each other, and serve one another. And an online-only church can’t do that effectively.

I’m sure some would disagree with me, arguing that it is possible to build such a community online. But just because you communicate with someone via Twitter or Facebook or a blog or whatever, that doesn’t mean it’s a community in the truest sense of the word. As author Anne Jackson points out, that’s not a community, it’s a connection:

In some instances, these online conversations have translated into personal communication (by email, chats, or phone) and some have even turned into face-to-face meetings. The platforms of social media certainly give these personal interactions a “jump start” so to speak, because you do, in some regard, know bits and pieces of the other person’s life.

But this is where it gets muddy for me. Is it community?

Given my experience living in both worlds, it may be surprising to hear, but I am beginning to lean on the side of no – what happens online is not community. Before you send me an army of frowning emoticons, please hear me out:

I believe what happens online is connection – not community.

People can be vulnerable and honest online. And at times these online connections can be more life-giving than many of our offline relationships, but they are not the same.

Can you have a church comprised solely of online connections? Absolutely not!

In 1 Corinthians 12, Paul describes the Church as the body of Christ, with each member having different spiritual gifts and different roles. Just as each part of a physical body has to do its job in order for the body as a whole to operate successfully, each member of the Church body has a responsibility to do their part. How is that possible if the extent of our church experience is watching a live stream of a worship service over the Internet?

Simply put: going to church and being a church are two totally different things. Sure, you can go to church online if you want. But that’s not the same as being an integral member of the church body.

You can go to a worship service every Sunday, come in, sit down, sing a few songs, listen to the sermon, then leave without ever talking to another person. Yes, you went to church. Yes, you worshiped alongside other believers. Yes, you heard a message. But you didn’t participate as a member of the body.

That doesn’t mean that there’s anything wrong with what Northland, Lifechurch.tv, or other churches are doing. Certainly, there are a lot of benefits to using Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube to help reach out to people all other the world. That’s a good thing, it just doesn’t need to be the only thing.

Previously:
Who are you following?
A little social network housecleaning
Proof that in social networking, smaller is better

I was 17 at the time. It was maybe around ten o’clock at night, I don’t remember. But I was sitting in my bed, reading the Bible and praying. As I closed my eyes, I suddenly had a vision, a crystal-clear image that I’ve never forgotten.  But it wasn’t just a picture, I felt it, too. It was so real, so powerful, so intense, that I immediately fell to the floor on my knees and began sobbing.

I had crucified Jesus.

In my vision, He was hanging on the cross, bloody, beaten, wincing in agony. And I stood at the base of it, still holding the mallet used to drive the nails into His wrists and feet.

The vision lasted only a split second, but it absolutely destroyed me. I had done this. I had tortured Him, struck Him, then nailed Him to a Roman crucifix to suffer a slow and excruciating death. It was all my fault.

Burying my face in my hands, all I could do was cry. Filled with unimaginable guilt and remorse, the only words I could get out were, “I’m sorry, I’m so sorry.” Over and over again, I apologized to God, overcome by my actions that I knew weren’t real but might as well have been. I may not have driven the nails into His hands, but it was because of my sin that He was up there.

Yes, Jesus died on the cross because of our sins. He paid the ultimate penalty so that we wouldn’t have to. But it took me a long time to let go of the guilt, the feeling that if I had only been better, if I had only done more, I could’ve prevented His suffering.

The truth is, no matter how good we are or how much we do, how often we go to church or how much we give to the poor, we’ll never be able to erase our sinful nature. Even as Christians, we’re still broken and defective. And that’s why Jesus came in the first place. Before the world was created, before mankind ever set foot on Earth, Jesus existed. Before we took our first breath, God knew we would fail and that there was nothing we could do on our own to do to fix it. No pill, no 12-step program, no act of Congress. Only God Himself could break the bonds of sin.

God didn’t sacrifice His Son to clean up after us the way a parent cleans up after their kids. It wasn’t to uphold some end of a deal — “I’ll give my Son for your sin if you promise to do XYZ.” It wasn’t to make us feel guilty and ashamed of our never-ending failures. It was all because of love.

We’ve heard John 3:16 repeated so many times that it’s become a cliché, but it’s still true: “For God so loved the world that He gave His one and only Son….” Why did He give His Son? Because He loves us. Two thousand years ago, today, tomorrow. And nothing will change that.

The good news, of course, is that the Easter story doesn’t end with Jesus’ death, but with His resurrection: the fulfillment of prophecy and the promise of a new life, set free from the chains of our past.

Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a huge crowd of witnesses to the life of faith, let us strip off every weight that slows us down, especially the sin that so easily trips us up. And let us run with endurance the race God has set before us. We do this by keeping our eyes on Jesus, the champion who initiates and perfects our faith. Because of the joy awaiting him, he endured the cross, disregarding its shame. Now he is seated in the place of honor beside God’s throne. Think of all the hostility he endured from sinful people; then you won’t become weary and give up.

– Hebrews 12:1-3 NLT

Happy Easter!

Previously:
‘His purpose in life was to go straight to the cross’
In the beginning…

Ahoy! This here be ye olde ruminations of the Lost of yore. Shiver me timbers!

(You mean this isn’t Talk Like A Pirate Day? Darn. Oh well. On with the blog then…)

• I like how in addition to Richard’s backstory, we got a little bit more of Ilana’s. It was also confirmed that Sun is, in fact, the Kwon Jacob’s list referred to. (Sorry, Jin, you were this close. Maybe next time, buddy.)
• We also found out how the Taweret statue became the less-impressive-but-way-creepier four-toed statue and how the Black Rock ended up in the middle of the jungle. Personally, I thought that was a little hokey and pretty unbelievable, but this is a show about time travel, so I guess I can suspend my disbelief a little longer.
• The Black Rock came to the island in 1837. Too bad it wasn’t 1842, then we could’ve gotten another iteration of the numbers. Although if you add 3 and 7, you get 10, and then if you take the 0 from the 10 and put it between the 1 and the 8, you get 108. Whoa, I just blew your mind, didn’t I?
• I love the look on Jack’s face when he was told Richard was leaving to join up with Locke. Jack: “Locke’s dead.” Hurley: “Well, it isn’t exactly Locke.”
• While in prison, Richard was reading the Bible, specifically Luke chapter 4. The camera focused on the latter part of the chapter in which Jesus heals Simon’s mother-in-law and many others and cast out a bunch of demons (vv. 38-41). Obviously, this was meant to tie in with Richard’s pleas for the healing of his wife. But I think the rest of the chapter is interesting as well. It starts out with Satan tempting Jesus, and certainly we’ve seen the Man In Black do plenty of tempting. It then goes on to tell about Jesus returning to his home in Galilee, where he reads from Isaiah 61:1-2:

“The Spirit of the Sovereign Lord  is upon me, for the Lord has anointed me to bring good news to the poor. He has sent me to comfort the brokenhearted and to proclaim that captives will be released and prisoners will be freed. He has sent me to tell those who mourn that the time of the Lord’s favor has come, and with it, the day of God’s anger against their enemies.”

• Certainly, the theme of redemption has been a big part of the show, but it’s also leading up to a final battle, where we’ll undoubtedly see Jacob’s anger against his enemies.
• Jacob explained that the island is like a cork, keeping the darkness contained from spreading to the rest of the world. That supports my theory from last week about Smokey wanting to break free from the prison that is the island in order to unleash his power on the world. I still think Widmore knows this and is on Smokey’s side.
• We got a really deep and ambiguous discussion between Jacob and Richard that revolved around free will vs. determinism. On the one hand, Jacob told Richard that no one could enter his statue shack without being invited in. That goes back to the concept within the Christian church of predestination, that is, the idea that God has known for all eternity who would be saved and who wouldn’t be, that those who had been chosen to be saved had been elected (or invited). Yet, Jacob went on to tell Richard that he wanted the people who came to the island (whom Jacob chose to bring) to make a choice to do the right thing, to choose to not be corrupted by the darkness, thus emphasizing the concept of free will. Once on the island, your past no longer matters; you have been freed from your sins and now have an opportunity for redemption. But you have to choose it, just as we all have an opportunity to be saved from our sins through Jesus but it must be a conscious choice on our part. Redemption imposed upon a person isn’t really redemption. Redemption can only be an act of free will.
• Richard then asked Jacob for forgiveness of his sins. Jacob said he couldn’t do that. I think what he meant was that in Jacob’s eyes, his sins had already been forgiven, but Richard still needed to forgive himself. But Jacob did offer Richard two things: eternal life and a job as his intermediary. Once we’re saved as a Christian, of course, we receive the gift of eternal life. But the Bible also says that we become Christ’s ambassadors, His representatives on earth, His “intermediaries”. Which is what Richard — newly freed from the chains of his sin and freshly baptized — became.
• Is Richard right? Are the Losties in Hell? No. And they’re not in Purgatory either. The Man In Black was lying to him, deceiving him, manipulating him, even going so far as to appear as Richard’s wife when he was chained to the ship. Again, that’s what Satan does: he lies to people.
• So what about his wife’s appearance to Hurley? Was that also a manifestation of Smokey? No, but I’m not sure it was specifically a manifestation of Jacob either. I think (hope) we’ll get a better answer to that question later as it’ll also explain the whole thing with Christian Shepherd.
• The Man In Black’s instructions to Richard for killing Jacob. Same sword and instructions given by Dogen to Sayid. Here’s my theory: I think Smokey really believed the sword would kill Jacob, but in reality it wouldn’t have. Jacob later gives it to Dogen with the same instructions, telling him it would kill Smokey (which obviously it didn’t). Dogen really believes it would work, but in reality, it was just an inside joke from Jacob back to Smokey. Or maybe not. I don’t know.

Update:
A quick sidenote regarding Luke 4 and Isaiah 62. I happened to be listening to a sermon yesterday from Wayne Braudrick of Frico Bible Church, and he was discussing the topic of humility. When the Scripture says, “the Lord has anointed me to bring good news to the poor,” it’s not talking about those in poverty, but rather those who are utterly destitute and broken. The Greek word is ptochos, which means “reduced to beggary, helpless, powerless to accomplish an end.” Which certainly describes Richard’s condition as well as that of Ben a couple of episodes ago. The Man In Black (Satan) offers only worldly power and possessions, but Jacob (Jesus) offers hope to the hopeless, which is far greater.

Previously:
Lost thoughts, Mar. 17
Lost thoughts, Mar. 10

Lost fans have been begging for answers and last night’s episode delivered them in spades, although I’m sure it left a lot of folks still scratching their heads. Personally, I thought the spiritual elements were really powerful, and there are so many parallels between it and the Gospel. So instead of my usual bullet-point braindump of random observations, I thought I’d spend a few minutes analyzing the episode from a Christian standpoint.

Major themes.

There are a couple of broad themes that Lost revolves around: (1) good vs. evil and (2) free will vs. determinism. You see these same themes played out in the Bible as well.

Certainly, it’s not hard to equate the battle between Jacob and the Man in Black to the battle between God and Satan. This is an eternal struggle that began long before mankind was created. Essentially, Satan is trying to defeat God, much the same way that MIB is trying to defeat Jacob, and we as humans are caught in the middle of this battle, just as the people on the island are caught in the middle. And as such, we must choose what side we’re on. Ephesians 6:12 says: “For we are not fighting against flesh-and-blood enemies, but against evil rulers and authorities of the unseen world, against mighty powers in this dark world, and against evil spirits in the heavenly places.” We are part of the larger eternal war whether we want to be or not.

Which gets back to the question of free will vs. determinism. MIB tells Sawyer that he has three choices. First, he can ignore Jacob’s invitation (i.e. God’s call to salvation) and see how his life plays out. Of course, the end result is always the same: death, with your name being crossed off the list. (Romans 6:23: “For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life through Christ Jesus our Lord.”) Second, he can accept the invitation. (Romans 10:9-10: “If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For it is by believing in your heart that you are made right with God, and it is by confessing with your mouth that you are saved.”) Or third, he can reject it outright. Likewise, we have the same choices, although really the first and the third lead to the same conclusion.

The debate over free will vs. determinism (or predestination) is a pretty big one within the Christian church. Has God already predetermined who will be saved, written their names and numbered them as Jacob did with his chosen “candidates”? Or are we free to choose for ourselves whether we are saved or not? I won’t even try to go into this discussion here, but you can see how this same theme is directly playing out in Lost. And I think the “sideways” storyline will continue to explore it throughout the rest of the season. Are the six chosen — Jack, Locke, Sawyer, Hurley, Sayid, and Kwon (most likely Sun) — predetermined to end up on the island even in this alternate universe, or did “rebooting” time break that cycle?

The Man in Black.

It’s fitting that the MIB has taken the appearance of Locke (the island’s “man of faith”). Satan, too, often appears as men of faith to deceive us. Jesus said in Matthew 7:15-16: “Beware of false prophets who come disguised as harmless sheep but are really vicious wolves. You can identify them by their fruit, that is, by the way they act.” In the same way, Sawyer was able to discern the fake Locke from the real Locke based on the way he acted. (The real Locke, he said, was full of fear.) Jesus also warned in Mark 13:5-6 that in the last days (final season?) “many will come in my name, claiming, ‘I am the Messiah.’ They will deceive many.” Sounds like the Man In Black to me. (Incidentally, it’s interesting to note that “sideways” Locke took a job as a substitute teacher. In other words, he wasn’t a real teacher, he was a false one (i.e. a false prophet).)

It’s also interesting to note Ilana’s statement that MIB is stuck looking like Locke. In Genesis 3, God condemns Satan to crawl on his belly, groveling in the dust as long as he lives. In the same way, MIB is cursed to live out his days on the island, stuck in whatever form he takes. Satan is not all powerful; he must conform to God’s rules and limits. MIB must also play by Jacob’s rules.

The death of Jacob.

The Man in Black thought he had found a loophole to defeating (killing) Jacob. Since he himself can’t kill Jacob, as he was reminded by the blonde-haired boy last night (angel? prophet?), he tried to manipulate Ben into killing him. In the same way, Judas Iscariot was deceived into betraying Jesus, which led to Jesus’ crucifixion. When Jesus died, Satan thought he had won (we saw MIB remove the white rock from the scale and toss it into the ocean). But Jesus’ death was part of God’s greater plan for mankind. His death opened the door for mankind to be saved. Jesus died so that we wouldn’t have to. Likewise, Jacob’s death, I believe, is part of a larger plan that will ultimately lead to the redemption of the island castaways. And just as Jesus rose from the grave on the third day after His death, I wonder if we’ll see Jacob be resurrected on the third day. (Ilana reminded us that Jacob was killed “yesterday”, so we should know soon enough.)

Previously:
Lost thoughts, Feb. 10
Lost thoughts, Feb. 3